Fuente: Research: UCLA  Newsroom
  Expuesto el: miércoles, 30 de mayo de 2012 18:03
  Autor: Research: UCLA Newsroom
  Asunto: UCLA life scientists view biodiversity through a whole new  dimension
|     May 30, 2012 Category:    Research How can blue whales, the    largest animals on the planet, survive by feeding on krill, shrimp-like    creatures that are the size of a penny? According to UCLA life scientists,    it's all a matter of dimensions. In findings published May    30 in the journal Nature, the researchers demonstrate for the first time that    the relationship between animals' body size and their feeding rate — the    overall amount of food they consume per unit of time — is largely determined    by the properties of the space in which they search for their food. An animal searching for    food in a three-dimensional space, like the ocean or sky, is likely to    consume much more than a similarly sized animal searching in a flat,    two-dimensional space, like a savannah or a sea bed, they found. "Surprisingly, the    spatial dimension of the search space turns out to be the most important    property," said Van Savage, senior author of the research and a UCLA    assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and of    biomathematics. "Yet up until now, work on food webs and predator–prey    relationships has almost universally assumed that feeding rate increases with    body size in a way that is independent of dimensionality." Animals, of course,    cannot simply go to the market when they are hungry. Instead, they must    search for their food, which can also move in space. Cheetahs, for instance,    scan the savannah for gazelle in two dimensions (left-to-right, forward-to-backward),    while sharks search the ocean and some birds, such as flycatchers, scour the    skies in 3-D (with an added up-and-down dimension). "Would you rather    search for food in two dimensions or three?" Savage asks. "That is,    would you rather search for food just left-to-right and forward-to-backward    on the floor of a room, or would you also want to search up-and-down, from    floor to ceiling? When I quiz people, including scientists, most say they    would rather search in two dimensions because it would be easier to find    food. But we found that in nature the third dimension usually adds a huge    number of extra resources. Ultimately, searching in this extra dimension    provides many more chances to find food." The UCLA researchers    developed a new mathematical model that predicted that feeding rates increase    more quickly with body size in three dimensions than in two. The model helps    explain why huge whales can subsist on tiny krill in three dimensions — but    likely could not in two dimensions, if they had evolved to live on land. To test their ideas and    model predictions, the researchers compiled and analyzed the largest-ever    database on relationships between feeding rates and body size. They were    surprised to discover how well the data fit their predictions. "I was amazed that    the data and theoretical predictions match so well," said Samraat Pawar,    lead author of the study and a UCLA postdoctoral scholar in Savage's group.    "After spending so many months working on the theory and wondering if it    really connected to reality and then spending so many more months finding and    analyzing real data for feeding relationships, I knew it was very meaningful    when they matched. "When looking across    species, an increase in consumer size leads to a much faster increase in feeding    rate in three dimensions than in two dimensions. Moreover, for two consumers    of the same body size, the one in three dimensions will typically have a much    higher feeding rate than the one in two dimensions. Our results reminded me    of Edwin Abbott's book 'Flatland,' in which denizens of a two-dimensional    world are trapped in an ostensibly inferior existence due to their inability    to perceive the third spatial dimension." This is one of the first    demonstrations, Pawar added, that uses both theory and data to show that    dimensionality has important implications for ecology. The ultimate goal of the    research, the scientists say, is predicting how climate change will affect    biodiversity levels and, thus for humans, the availability of goods and    services, such as food and plants, fungi or bacteria used to make    pharmaceuticals. The new findings suggest there may be crucial differences in    how climate change will affect ecosystems that are more two dimensional, such    as land and water surfaces, and those that are three dimensional, such as the    open ocean or air. The study also predicts    that the stronger feeding interactions in three dimensions — that is, the    tendency for animals to consume more than they would in two dimensions — will    lead more often to boom-and-bust cycles in the abundance of species,    analogous to large fluctuations seen in stocks or housing prices. These booms    and busts make species more prone to extinction and therefore "could    have profound consequences for understanding and preserving biodiversity in    different habitats and for the planet as a whole," Savage said. What made the UCLA study    "unique and allowed for the discovery of new patterns was the    researchers' focus on pairs of species — just one 'consumer' species feeding    on just one 'resource' species — for both the modeling and data," said    study co-author Anthony Dell, a UCLA researcher in Savage's group. "Previous studies    looked at many species together and at properties of whole ecological systems    or whole food webs that describe all potential feeding relationships,"    Dell said. "All of the existing food-web models assume that    dimensionality does not affect how feeding rates increase with body size.    However, we found there is both a strong and systematic interdependence that    should be straightforward to incorporate into models and data analysis. Our    findings mean that a lot of the previous work may need to be revised." Savage's research group    also has a unique approach that utilizes perspectives from physics and    applied mathematics to study biological problems. "Having been trained    in theoretical particle physics, I automatically consider dimensionality as    part of any problem, but I was impressed by how large the effect is    here," Savage said. "Dimensionality has long been considered    important in physics, where people think about string theory and extra    dimensions of space." The scientists are    currently looking at the effects of temperature — another major driver of    feeding rates — and studying how to combine that with the results of the current    study on feeding rates and dimensionality. The research was    federally funded by the National Science Foundation. UCLA is    California's largest university, with an enrollment of nearly 38,000    undergraduate and graduate students. The UCLA College of Letters and Science    and the university's 11 professional schools feature renowned faculty and    offer 337 degree programs and majors. UCLA is a national and international    leader in the breadth and quality of its academic, research, health care,    cultural, continuing education and athletic programs. Six alumni and five    faculty have been awarded the Nobel Prize. For more    news, visit the UCLA Newsroom and    follow us on Twitter. 
 | 
 
